Emotional memory
The moments that mattered are the ones you keep. Feeling is the encoder's thumb on the scale.
lunch with Dana
- eventshe tells you about her new job
- feltan ordinary catch-up
the next six months
- starting strength
- fades to half in
- 5 weeks
In the brain
Emotion is the encoder’s thumb on the scale. Arousing events are remembered better and longer: the amygdala modulates hippocampal consolidation, and stress hormones flag an event as important as it’s laid downMcGaugh 2000. It’s why a flashbulb memory survives while a thousand ordinary Tuesdays vanish — and emotional memories don’t just start stronger, they decay more slowly.
The model
Two effects, not one: an affective weight on initial encoding strength, and a reduced decay rate. Emotion changes both the height and the slope of the forgetting curve — a fact most implementations quietly drop.
In AI
Usually collapsed into a single salience axis. DeWix weights adjectives “reflecting the emotional context”; Dynamic Affective Memory Management keeps an affective dimension in a numeric salience profile; Counterparts records feelings at encoding and lets the strongest one slow a memory’s fading. But almost nothing else lets emotion change the decay rate the way the amygdala does — it’s treated as starting weight only.
The map
Emotional salience axis — partially anticipated (KR claim 2; Dynamic Affective Memory).
3 prior-art references
- Anderson, Laird, Dancy~2013ACT-R / Soar / ACT-RΦ — cognitive architecturespaperACT-R ↗
- DeWix Co., Ltd.2025Memory-curve context maintenancepatentGoogle Patents ↗
- Dynamic Affective Memory Management2025Dynamic Affective Memory ManagementpaperarXiv ↗
1 post-priority (field context, not prior art)
- Mike LaPeter2026CounterpartsossSite ↗
Emotion-as-initial-weight is partially claimed. Emotion-as-slower-forgetting — a distinct decay rate for what mattered — is largely open.