CounterpartsCounterpartsThe Memory Field GuideDirectory
StorageAI: occupied

Decay & the forgetting curve

Forgetting is not the failure of memory. It is one of its functions.

Contested — Whether forgetting is true decay or retrieval interference is a century-old, still-unsettled question.

0%25%50%75%100%day 07d14d21d30dsteepest in the first dayslevels off — the rest sticks
a book you read once — what’s left
  • that perfect line you underlined100%
  • the argument of chapter one100%
  • the author's name100%
  • how it made you feel100%
  • the gist — it changed how you think100%
day 0 · curve at 100% · everything is still fresh

In the brain

Memories weaken with time unless they’re renewed. Ebbinghaus measured it on himself in 1885 — a steep initial drop that flattens into a long tailEbbinghaus 1885. Forgetting isn’t simply failure: it clears capacity and keeps one-off events from overwriting durable knowledge.

Whether the trace physically fades or is just crowded out by competitors is a century-old open question.

The model

The forgetting curve. Retention falls off as an exponential or, better-fitting, a power-law function of elapsed timeWickelgren 1974, modulated by how strongly it was encoded and flattened each time it’s retrieved — the mathematics behind spaced repetition.

In AI

The most-copied idea in AI memory. MemoryBank applies Ebbinghaus directly; a granted EMC/Dell patent decays relevance by linear, exponential, or step functions; DeWix claims R = e^(−a·x). Counterparts computes strength on read from salience, access history, and elapsed time rather than storing a stale number. Most systems still decay linearly, which doesn’t match the brain’s power-law shape.

The map

Forgetting-curve decay — anticipated (KR102809164B1 claim 1; Alai Vault spec).

11 prior-art references

1 post-priority (field context, not prior art)

Decay curves are anticipated many times over. What almost no one models: the difference between true forgetting (the trace is gone) and retrieval failure (it’s intact, but the path to it is lost).

How an AI memory can do this

Every AI memory makes a choice about this mechanism, whether or not its makers name it.

Counterparts is an AI memory modeled on human memory; its home page shows each of its mechanisms, this one included. See it on the Counterparts home

The directory rates 12 AI memory systems on the same eleven mechanisms, in plain language and with sources.

Compare them side by side

References

Sources

  1. H. Ebbinghaus (1885). Über das Gedächtnis (Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology). Duncker & Humblot.
  2. W. A. Wickelgren (1974). Single-trace fragility theory of memory dynamics. Memory & Cognition, 2(4).

From The Memory Field Guide: every source, the full landscape of patents, papers and open-source systems, and the method behind it.